Difference between revisions of "Developer Certificate Of Origin"

From eLinux.org
Jump to: navigation, search
(update year)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
to the Linux kernel.
 
to the Linux kernel.
  
The full text of the DCO is:
+
The text of the DCO is located in the file [http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/SubmittingPatches Documentation/SubmittingPatches]
 +
in the Linux kernel source tree.
 +
 
 +
The full text of the DCO version 1.1 (the current version as of 2011) is:
 +
 
 +
<pre>
 +
        Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
 +
 
 +
        By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
 +
 
 +
        (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
 +
            have the right to submit it under the open source license
 +
            indicated in the file; or
 +
 
 +
        (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
 +
            of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
 +
            license and I have the right under that license to submit that
 +
            work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
 +
            by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
 +
            permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
 +
            in the file; or
 +
 
 +
        (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
 +
            person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
 +
            it.
 +
 
 +
        (d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
 +
            are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
 +
            personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
 +
            maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
 +
            this project or the open source license(s) involved.
 +
</pre>
 +
 
 +
There is a kernel thread discussing the original proposal from Linus
 +
[http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=1YUY7-6fF-11%40gated-at.bofh.it&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dg:thl3436074442d%26dq%3D%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D1YUY7-6fF-11%2540gated-at.bofh.it here (google groups).] And
 +
[http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=108529494402563&w=2 here (aimsgroup).]
 +
 
 +
Here is another article describing rationale for the 1.1 version:
 +
[http://kerneltrap.org/node/5277 Clarifying the Developer's Certificate of Origin] KernelTrap, June 14, 2005
 +
 
 +
== Example ==
 +
Here is an example Signed-off-by line, that indicates the submitter accepts the DCO:
 +
<pre>
 +
Signed-off-by: John Doe <john.doe@hisdomain.com>
 +
</pre>
 +
 
 +
== Older versions ==
 +
 
 +
The original DCO, version 1.0, read:
  
 
<pre>
 
<pre>
Line 22: Line 70:
 
     certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified it.
 
     certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified it.
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
 
Here is the online reference for the official DCO:
 
http://www.osdl.org/newsroom/press_releases/2004/2004_05_24_dco.html
 
 
Here is an announcement talking about DCO:
 
http://www.osdl.org/newsroom/press_releases/2004/2004_05_24_beaverton.html
 
 
There is a kernel thread discussing the original proposal from Linus
 
[http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=1YUY7-6fF-11%40gated-at.bofh.it&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dg:thl3436074442d%26dq%3D%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D1YUY7-6fF-11%2540gated-at.bofh.it here (google groups).] And
 
[http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=108529494402563&w=2 here (aimsgroup).]
 
  
 
[[Category:Categories]]
 
[[Category:Categories]]

Latest revision as of 18:25, 11 April 2011

In May 2004, the kernel development community decided to standardize on a requirement to adhere to a Developer Certificate of Origin for contributions to the Linux kernel.

The text of the DCO is located in the file Documentation/SubmittingPatches in the Linux kernel source tree.

The full text of the DCO version 1.1 (the current version as of 2011) is:

        Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1

        By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:

        (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
            have the right to submit it under the open source license
            indicated in the file; or

        (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
            of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
            license and I have the right under that license to submit that
            work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
            by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
            permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
            in the file; or

        (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
            person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
            it.

        (d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
            are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
            personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
            maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
            this project or the open source license(s) involved.

There is a kernel thread discussing the original proposal from Linus here (google groups). And here (aimsgroup).

Here is another article describing rationale for the 1.1 version: Clarifying the Developer's Certificate of Origin KernelTrap, June 14, 2005

Example

Here is an example Signed-off-by line, that indicates the submitter accepts the DCO:

Signed-off-by: John Doe <john.doe@hisdomain.com>

Older versions

The original DCO, version 1.0, read:

    Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.0

    By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:

    (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I have the right
    to submit it under the open source license indicated in the file; or

    (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best of my knowledge,
    is covered under an appropriate open source license and I have the right under that
    license to submit that work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
    by me, under the same open source license (unless I am permitted to submit under a
    different license), as indicated in the file; or

    (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other person who
    certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified it.