Buildroot:ReproducibleBuilds

As part of a Google Summer of Code project, Atharva Lele works on reproducible builds.

Away time
Arnout is away on: 10/6; some time in July; 15-19/8.

Meetings
Weekly meetings on appear.in/buildroot every Tuesdays at 14:30 UTC.


 * 2019-W24
 * reprotest
 * When building under reprotest, building tar fails: https://pastebin.com/2UbQSuu4 - maybe some issue with uid mapping?
 * For now, leave it alone, we can revisit later.
 * Reprotest already does two builds and compares the results. It's pretty invasive in terms of what it expects from the environment.
 * Probably better to use reprotest as inspiration and do the same from autobuild-run.
 * disorderfs
 * It uses a FUSE filesystem to randomize the order in which files are listed.
 * Also didn't succeed, autobuild-run fails because the output directory isn't removed.
 * Also the second build failed, because a file was changed while it was being tarred.
 * Cfr. https://pastebin.com/pzGfF1c9
 * For now, leave it alone, we can revisit later.
 * Next steps: choose between:
 * Continue on reprotest and disorderfs
 * Improve autobuild-run script, e.g. build in two different directories
 * Improve reporting on the autobuild website.
 * For next week:
 * Collect the review feedback which has not been implemented yet
 * Introduce Builder class in autobuild-run
 * Use this to store the output_dir
 * This makes it easy to do two builds with different output_dir
 * In parallel, mark failures as reason=reproducible
 * Add a 'reason' file in the build results
 * Use that in PHP script
 * 2019-W23
 * Initial round-up of autobuild scripts patches
 * Basically, look OK-ish
 * Not bisectable because reverse order
 * Re-spin in correct order, but still split for ease of review
 * Ultimately, to be committed squashed together
 * diffoscope is silent on success, and so is cmp -> diffoscope_result.txt can be used to determine if reason should be set to reproducible.
 * Atharva will evaluate the reprotest and disorderfs projects to see if they can be useful for our reproducible tests.
 * Atharva should add a journal (log) to this wiki page two or three times a week
 * 2019-W22
 * As discussed on IRC, diffoscope only needs to be done if cmp detects differences. However, it doesn't take long anyway, and it *will* report if there is a difference.
 * diffoscope must be done on output/target/ and target/images, but autobuilders don't enable any images. So when doing a reproducible test, a tarball must be generated.
 * Manually try this, to be sure that it also looks inside the generated images.
 * Enable one / all target filesystems to check this manually.
 * Disable BR2_REPRODUCIBLE for this test, so there actually are some differences.
 * diffoscope has a lot of dependencies, we don't want all of these on the autobuilders
 * Try what the output is if the external tools are not installed
 * autobuilder script should fall back on cmp if diffoscope is not installed
 * Start patching autobuilder script to do a reproducible test.
 * Randomly enable BR2_REPRODUCIBLE, e.g. 10% of the times
 * Do the same build a second time. Only variation is time.
 * Run diffoscope on the result.
 * 2019-W21
 * Confirmed that starting from next week, work is full-time on GSoC (end of exams)
 * Review of the Yocto implementation
 * differences: Yocto is a distribution, so has a cache of the output, while buildroot does not
 * SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH and TZ: already done (depends on BR2_REPRODUCIBLE)
 * Doing similar in Buildroot:
 * Do a first build with a successfull config from autobuilders, after enabling BR2_REPRODUCIBLE
 * Then mv $(O)/target to $(O)/target-1; make clean; make
 * And then run diffoscope target-1 target/
 * Identify diffoscope dependencies to run it in autobuilders (eventually)
 * How to save and present the result on autobuilder site?
 * 2019-W20
 * introductions
 * confirm overal actions and planning

Yocto's Implementation

 * Wiki page: Reproducible Builds


 * Shared State Mechanism: If input metadata hashes are same, outputs are reused. If inputs have changed, tools from Reproducible-Builds to be used. Further development yet to be done.
 * At this stage, binary contents should be same. However file timestamps (due to package managers) may be different.
 * Static Timezone value: Bugzilla
 * Adapted SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH: Bugzilla, Source-Date-Epoch - Reproducible Builds
 * Archives generated with deterministic metadata (using archive tools' arguments)
 * Remove non-deterministic data from rootfs


 * Diffoscope data on their shared states: yocto-reproduciblebuilds-data

Diffoscope Dependencies

 * Depends on: python3, PyPI modules: libarchive-c, python-magic
 * External tools requied: Rscript, abootimg, apktool, bsdtar, bzip2, cbfstool, cd-iccdump, cmp, compare, convert, db_dump, diff, docx2txt, dumpxsb, enjarify, fdtdump, ffprobe, getfacl, ghc, gifbuild, gpg, gzip, identify, img2txt, isoinfo, javap, js-beautify, lipo, llvm-bcanalyzer, llvm-dis, lsattr, lz4, msgunfmt, nm, objcopy, objdump, ocamlobjinfo, odt2txt, oggDump, otool, pdftotext, pedump, pgpdump, ppudump, procyon, ps2ascii, readelf, showttf, sng, sqlite3, ssconvert, ssh-keygen, stat, tcpdump, unsquashfs, wasm2wat, xxd, xz, zipinfo, zipnote
 * This has tools used to compare a lot of file formats that probably aren't generated (like android APKs, Windows/Mac executables) in a Buildroot run. We can exclude those.
 * APT packages (available in Ubuntu, Debian): abootimg, acl, apktool, binutils-multiarch, bzip2, caca-utils, colord, coreutils, db-util, default-jdk-headless | default-jdk | java-sdk, device-tree-compiler, diffutils, docx2txt, e2fsprogs, enjarify, ffmpeg, fontforge-extras, fp-utils, genisoimage, gettext, ghc, ghostscript, giflib-tools, gnumeric, gnupg, gzip, imagemagick, jsbeautifier, libarchive-tools, llvm, lz4 | liblz4-tool, mono-utils, ocaml-nox, odt2txt, oggvideotools, openssh-client, pgpdump, poppler-utils, procyon-decompiler, r-base-core, sng, sqlite3, squashfs-tools, tcpdump, unzip, xmlbeans, xxd | vim-common, xz-utils, zip

Sample Diffoscope Output

 * Minimal config build (make defconfig; make). Will run diffoscope on a build from Autobuilder config tomorrow.
 * Builds run about 10 minutes apart.
 * Moved first build to target, and rerun. Then run diffoscope target-1 target > diff.txt
 * diffoscope log: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/VpMbW4qQQP/
 * Except for a time record in the busybox binary, all other differences seem to be only timestamps of file generation.

Planning

 * Week 20: study how yocto does it
 * Week 21: ...
 * Week 22: do two builds in autobuild-run script
 * Week 23: revisit patches to autobuild-run
 * Week 24: autobuild-run: different output directories; report with reason=reproducible
 * Week 25: improve how reproducible results are shown on http://autobuild.buildroot.org
 * Week 26: Fix the reproducible issues found until now
 * Week 27: Further extend autobuild-run script with more variation
 * Week 28: Tooling to understand where the differences come from (e.g. which package)
 * Week 29: More tooling to analyse differences
 * Week 30: More tooling to analyse differences

Progress Journal

 * 06/06/2019:
 * Setup Gitlab account to track issues and progress
 * Pushed dev branch to Gitlab, as well as re-spun commits and pushed


 * 07/06/2019:
 * Submitted v2 patches to mailing list
 * Submitted patch to enable BR2_REPRODUCIBLE
 * Started evaluating reprotest and its working


 * 08/06/2019:
 * Worked on v3 patches, their current form pushed to Gitlab for now
 * Submitted patch to add Buildroot to Reproducible Builds: Who's involved (Merged and visible on website)


 * 09/06/2019 - 11/06/2019:
 * Finished v3 patches, sent to mailing list
 * Evaluated reprotest & disorderfs, discussed with Arnout during meeting
 * Less work done than possible due to lack of planning, now have planned till week 30


 * 12/06/2019:
 * Explored PHP components of Autobuilder website to identify what and how to modify
 * Learned basic syntax and working of PHP since I've never worked with it before
 * Brushed up on using classes in python because it has been a while since I worked using classes
 * Now it's easier for me to implement the Builder class


 * 13/06/2019:
 * Worked on implementing and transitioning to Builder class
 * Will push code to Gitlab tomorrow after removing errors


 * 14/06/2019:
 * First step of transitioning to Builder class done, pushed to Gitlab
 * Testing it thoroughly before sending to mailing list
 * Created and sent reproducible-v4 to mailing list, Gitlab

Code
Atharva Lele's on-going work to make the autobuilder scripts reproducible-aware (check the reproducible-vN branches).

GSoC Proposal
The proposal PDF can be found here: PDF