Difference between revisions of "Device Trees"

From eLinux.org
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 41: Line 41:
=== Up-coming ===
=== Coming Up Soon ===
Grant's talk at Plumber's conference 2009 - http://linuxplumbersconf.org/ocw/proposals/47
Grant's talk at Plumber's conference 2009 - http://linuxplumbersconf.org/ocw/proposals/47

Revision as of 10:36, 31 July 2009


Device trees are a method used by the operating system to determine the hardware configuration. Device trees were originally developed for the PowerPC OpenFirmware software, as a way to encapsulate platform information and convey it to the operating system. The Linux kernel currently can read device tree information for x86 and ppc architectures. There is interest in extending support for device trees to other platforms, to unify the handling of platform description across kernel architectures.

A device tree can be built at compile-time and statically linked into the kernel. Or it can be created by the bootloader firmware and passed to the kernel at boot time. The operating system reads the device tree and uses it to figure out such things like how much memory is available, bus layout, list of devices, and how interrupts are connected.


"Using the Device Tree to Describe Embedded Hardware" - Grant Likely, Embedded Linux Conference, 2008 http://www.celinux.org/elc08_presentations/glikely--device-tree.pdf

"A Symphony of Flavours: Using the device tree to describe embedded hardware" - Grant Likely and Josh Boyer - paper for OLS 2008 http://ols.fedoraproject.org/OLS/Reprints-2008/likely2-reprint.pdf

Note from Device Tree Birds of a Feature session at OLS 2008: http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2008-July/000004.html

Xilinx provides a device-tree generator: http://xilinx.wikidot.com/device-tree-generator "The device tree generator is a Xilinx EDK tool that plugs into the Automatic BSP Generation features of the tool, XPS"

Mailing list discussion

Recent discussion of "Flattened Device Tree" work on linux-embedded mailing list: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org/msg01721.html

Russel King is against adding support for FTD to the ARM platform: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0905.3/01942.html (see whole thread for interesting discussion)

David Gibson defends FTD: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0905.3/02304.html

Coming Up Soon

Grant's talk at Plumber's conference 2009 - http://linuxplumbersconf.org/ocw/proposals/47