Difference between revisions of "Device tree history"

From eLinux.org
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page. Moved "Mailing list discussion" from Device_tree)
 
(Mailing list discussion: copied category tags from Device_tree by mistake. delete them.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Mailing list discussion ==
 
== Mailing list discussion ==
 
Recent discussion of "Flattened Device Tree" work on linux-embedded mailing list:
 
Recent discussion of "Flattened Device Tree" work on linux-embedded mailing list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org/msg01721.html
+
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org/msg01721.html
  
 
Russel King is against adding support for FDT to the ARM platform:
 
Russel King is against adding support for FDT to the ARM platform:
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0905.3/01942.html
+
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0905.3/01942.html
 
(see whole thread for interesting discussion)
 
(see whole thread for interesting discussion)
  
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
David Gibson defends FDT:
 
David Gibson defends FDT:
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0905.3/02304.html
+
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0905.3/02304.html
[[Category:Bootloader]]
 
[[Category:Kernel]]
 

Revision as of 19:41, 18 June 2015

Mailing list discussion

Recent discussion of "Flattened Device Tree" work on linux-embedded mailing list:

http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org/msg01721.html

Russel King is against adding support for FDT to the ARM platform:

http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0905.3/01942.html

(see whole thread for interesting discussion)

But maybe Russel can be convinced: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0905.3/03618.html

David Gibson defends FDT:

http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0905.3/02304.html