image for IDP JTAG Lure needs to be refreshed

Jump to: navigation, search

as it doesn't match the current design files (per Revision A2). And, in particular, because it appears that the orientation of the Samtec BSH-030 is not correct on the Revision A1, at least per the image shown!

Note also, that IDP is not a conventional term of art - I believe that it should read as ITP (for in-target probe).

06:07, 30 April 2015

wait a minute! a closer examination of Revision A2 doesn't look right either!

per the prints and footprints at https://www.samtec.com/technical-specifications/Default.aspx?SeriesMaster=BSH:

- PDF File  BSH - .5mm (.0197") Basic Socket Strip
- PDF File  BSH - Surface Mount Footprint

shouldn't the alignment pins be on the pin-2 side?!

06:36, 30 April 2015

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
  • You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Return to Thread:Minnowboard talk:MaxLures/image for IDP JTAG Lure needs to be refreshed/reply (2).

We've got some internally that we know work, if it would be helpful I'm happy to double check the schematic vs. what we've got and know works, if they are wrong I can let the manufacturer know, see if we can get a more up to date set of files put together.

Warthog9 (talk)10:29, 30 April 2015

Thanks much for your reply, Warthog9! I've looked at the schematic and it seems fine - what seems to be the problem is that it seems it's not possible to mount the BSH-030 on the Revision A2 adapter such that the socket pins will line up with the signal traces as required! (of course, the error may be mine ...) Is your adapter internally built? If it's based on the CircuitCo PCB, which Revision? Thanks again!

11:32, 30 April 2015
 
 
 

Properly, yes, it should be called ITP vs. JTAG. We are working on a more normal openjtag interface but it wouldn't use this connector either

Warthog9 (talk)10:30, 30 April 2015