image for IDP JTAG Lure needs to be refreshed

Jump to: navigation, search

as it doesn't match the current design files (per Revision A2). And, in particular, because it appears that the orientation of the Samtec BSH-030 is not correct on the Revision A1, at least per the image shown!

Note also, that IDP is not a conventional term of art - I believe that it should read as ITP (for in-target probe).

07:07, 30 April 2015

wait a minute! a closer examination of Revision A2 doesn't look right either!

per the prints and footprints at

- PDF File  BSH - .5mm (.0197") Basic Socket Strip
- PDF File  BSH - Surface Mount Footprint

shouldn't the alignment pins be on the pin-2 side?!

07:36, 30 April 2015

Has anyone successfully used this adapter, in any revision, in combination with an Intel ITP kit (XDP3) or equivalent (such as ASSET USB-XDP3, PODII or Arium XDP3/XDP3e?)??

07:38, 30 April 2015

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
  • You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Return to Thread:Minnowboard talk:MaxLures/image for IDP JTAG Lure needs to be refreshed/reply (3).

Thanks much for your reply, Warthog9! I've looked at the schematic and it seems fine - what seems to be the problem is that it seems it's not possible to mount the BSH-030 on the Revision A2 adapter such that the socket pins will line up with the signal traces as required! (of course, the error may be mine ...) Is your adapter internally built? If it's based on the CircuitCo PCB, which Revision? Thanks again!

12:32, 30 April 2015

Properly, yes, it should be called ITP vs. JTAG. We are working on a more normal openjtag interface but it wouldn't use this connector either

11:30, 30 April 2015