image for IDP JTAG Lure needs to be refreshed

Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 30 April 2015 at 18:30.
The highlighted comment was created in this revision.

as it doesn't match the current design files (per Revision A2). And, in particular, because it appears that the orientation of the Samtec BSH-030 is not correct on the Revision A1, at least per the image shown!

Note also, that IDP is not a conventional term of art - I believe that it should read as ITP (for in-target probe).

    07:07, 30 April 2015

    wait a minute! a closer examination of Revision A2 doesn't look right either!

    per the prints and footprints at https://www.samtec.com/technical-specifications/Default.aspx?SeriesMaster=BSH:

    - PDF File  BSH - .5mm (.0197") Basic Socket Strip
    - PDF File  BSH - Surface Mount Footprint
    

    shouldn't the alignment pins be on the pin-2 side?!

      07:36, 30 April 2015

      Has anyone successfully used this adapter, in any revision, in combination with an Intel ITP kit (XDP3) or equivalent (such as ASSET USB-XDP3, PODII or Arium XDP3/XDP3e?)??

        07:38, 30 April 2015

        We've got some internally that we know work, if it would be helpful I'm happy to double check the schematic vs. what we've got and know works, if they are wrong I can let the manufacturer know, see if we can get a more up to date set of files put together.

          11:29, 30 April 2015
           
           

          Properly, yes, it should be called ITP vs. JTAG. We are working on a more normal openjtag interface but it wouldn't use this connector either

            11:30, 30 April 2015